Cartwright Inquiry

The Full Story Behind the Inquiry Into Cervical Cancer Treatment – and the Backlash

  • Unfortunate Experiment
    • The Experiment
    • Metro Article
    • Green’s Other Studies
    • Attempts to Stop
    • 1984 Paper
    • Doctors in Denial – Summary of Book
    • Timeline taken from UB and updated
  • Cartwright Inquiry
    • About the Inquiry
    • Other Issues
    • Findings
    • Recommendations – Link to the Report
    • Responses
    • Timeline of the Enquiry
  • Women and the Inquiry
    • Women’s Involvement
    • Ruth
    • TOR Three Women
    • Outcomes for Women
  • Implementation
    • Health and Disability Commission
    • Patient Advocacy
    • Informed Consent
    • Research Ethics
    • Teaching
    • National Cervical Screening Programme
    • Dysplasia Review – What it Was
    • Outcome for Doctors and National Women’s Hospital
    • Consumer Voice
    • Women’s Health Movement
  • Pushback
    • Medical Response
    • Media
    • Five Year Follow Up
    • University of Auckland – Lynda Bryder
    • Pushback from Overseas
    • Answering the Critics
    • The Cartwright Papers
  • About Us
    • Cartwright Collective
    • Biographies
    • Our Activities
    • Sources Where to find Papers
    • Contact Us
  • Unfortunate Experiment
    • The Experiment
    • Metro Article
    • Green’s Other Studies
    • Attempts to Stop
    • 1984 Paper
    • Doctors in Denial – Summary of Book
    • Timeline taken from UB and updated
  • Cartwright Inquiry
    • About the Inquiry
    • Other Issues
    • Findings
    • Recommendations – Link to the Report
    • Responses
    • Timeline of the Enquiry
  • Women and the Inquiry
    • Women’s Involvement
    • Ruth
    • TOR Three Women
    • Outcomes for Women
  • Implementation
    • Health and Disability Commission
    • Patient Advocacy
    • Informed Consent
    • Research Ethics
    • Teaching
    • National Cervical Screening Programme
    • Dysplasia Review – What it Was
    • Outcome for Doctors and National Women’s Hospital
    • Consumer Voice
    • Women’s Health Movement
  • Pushback
    • Medical Response
    • Media
    • Five Year Follow Up
    • University of Auckland – Lynda Bryder
    • Pushback from Overseas
    • Answering the Critics
    • The Cartwright Papers
  • About Us
    • Cartwright Collective
    • Biographies
    • Our Activities
    • Sources Where to find Papers
    • Contact Us
  • Informed Consent

    Code of Rights

    May 28, 2021 /

    Health and Disability Commissioner (Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights) Regulations 1996 1. Consumers have rights and providers have duties:​ (1) Every consumer has the rights in this Code. (2) Every provider is subject to the duties in this Code. (3) Every provider must take action to— (a) Inform consumers of their rights; and (b) Enable consumers to exercise their rights. 2. Rights of consumers and duties of providers: The rights of consumers and the duties of providers under this Code are as follows: Right 1Right to be treated with respect (1) Every consumer has the right to be treated with respect. (2) Every consumer has the right…

    Read More
    Pauline Proud
  • Health and Disability Commission

    The Health and Disability Commission

    May 28, 2021 /

    The purpose of the Health and Disability Commissioner is to promote and protect the rights of consumers as set out in the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights. This includes resolving complaints in a fair, timely, and effective way. Website: https://www.hdc.org.nz

    Read More
    Pauline Proud
  • Uncategorized,  University of Auckland - Lynda Bryder

    Letter to Sandra Coney and Phillida Bunkle

    May 28, 2021 /

    Read More
    Pauline Proud
  • About the Inquiry,  Uncategorized

    Cartwright Inquiry Report Chapters and Appendices

    May 28, 2021 /

    Read More
    Pauline Proud
© Cartwright Inquiry 2025